United States v. Rodriguez
This text of United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-20349 Document: 00516617737 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-20349 Summary Calendar FILED January 20, 2023 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Charles Joseph Rodriguez,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-137-1 ______________________________
Before Davis, Smith, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Charles Joseph Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-20349 Document: 00516617737 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2023
No. 22-20349
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-ca5-2023.