United States v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2022·No. 21-51209·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 21-51209 Document: 00516491542 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED September 30, 2022 No. 21-51209 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jesus Jose Rodriguez,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 7:21-CR-194-1

Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Rodriguez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circum- stances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-51209 Document: 00516491542 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/30/2022

No. 21-51209

the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to with- draw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez, (5th Cir. 2022).

United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)