United States v. Rodriguez

115 F. App'x 745
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. 04-40687·Unpublished·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Alexander Romero Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior convic *746 tion is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez, 115 F. App'x 745 (5th Cir. 2004).

115 F. App'x 745 (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De La Cruz-Gonzalez v. United States
544 U.S. 1014 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Cruz v. United States
544 U.S. 1013 (Supreme Court, 2005)