United States v. Rodriguez

683 F. App'x 656
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 768 F.3d 1270
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2017·No. 16-1384·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) letter in which the government informs the court of the Supreme Court decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017), and the defendant’s “Statement Re: Beckles,” in which the defendant states that he “agrees with the Government that Beckles forecloses relief in this case.”

Upon consideration thereof, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez, 683 F. App'x 656 (10th Cir. 2017).

683 F. App'x 656 (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beckles v. United States
580 U.S. 256 (Supreme Court, 2017)