United States v. Roderick Wheless

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 9, 2025
Docket24-6722
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Roderick Wheless (United States v. Roderick Wheless) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Roderick Wheless, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6722 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6722

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODERICK WARNER WHELESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cr-00230-WO-1)

Submitted: August 29, 2025 Decided: October 9, 2025

Before KING, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Warner Wheless, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6722 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/09/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Warner Wheless appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

a sentence reduction or compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. See United States v. Wheless, No. 1:07-cr-00230-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. July 11, 2024);

see also United States v. Davis, 99 F.4th 647, 659 (4th Cir. 2024) (“Even if a district court

abuses its discretion in assessing whether the defendant presents extraordinary and

compelling reasons for release, this Court may still affirm if the district court’s

consideration of the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors was sound.”). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Antonio Davis
99 F.4th 647 (Fourth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Roderick Wheless, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roderick-wheless-ca4-2025.