United States v. Robertson

474 F. App'x 150
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6156
StatusPublished

This text of 474 F. App'x 150 (United States v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robertson, 474 F. App'x 150 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ray Antoine Robertson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the revised drug equivalency tables implemented by Amendment 750, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (USSG) § 2D1.1 cmt. n. 10(D) (2011), do not alter Robertson’s sentence. See USSG §§ 1B1.10, 2D1.1(c)(4), app. C Amend. 750. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We deny Robertson’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F. App'x 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robertson-ca4-2012.