United States v. Roberts

381 F. App'x 313
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2010·No. 09-8045·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lucien Antonio Roberts appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Roberts, No. 4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4 (EJD.Va. Oct. 22, 2009 & filed Nov. 4, 2009, entered Nov. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Roberts, 381 F. App'x 313 (4th Cir. 2010).

381 F. App'x 313 (United States v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related