United States v. Roberts

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Roberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 F. App'x 80
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2008·No. 08-7279·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LUCIEN ANTONIO ROBERTS, a/k/a Lou,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge (4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 23, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lucien Antonio Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lucien Antonio Roberts appeals from the district

court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Roberts, No. 4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4 (E.D. Va. filed

June 18, 2008 & entered June 19, 2008; July 22, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Roberts, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Roberts (United States v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related