United States v. Roberto Oliver-Guzman
This text of 407 F. App'x 241 (United States v. Roberto Oliver-Guzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Roberto Oliver-Guzman appeals from the 65-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.
Oliver-Guzman contends that the district court procedurally erred when it did not consider his policy arguments against the 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2. The record indicates that the district court mistakenly believed that it did not have the authority to reject the 16-level enhancement on policy grounds. See Spears v. United States, 555 U.S. 261, 129 S.Ct. 840, 843-44, 172 L.Ed.2d 596 (2009) (per curiam); United States v. Mitchell, 624 F.3d 1023, 1028 (9th Cir.2010) (“[District judges are at liberty to reject any Guideline on policy grounds....”). We vacate and remand for resentencing. See Moore v. United States, 555 U.S. 1, 129 S.Ct. 4, 5, 172 L.Ed.2d 1 (2008)(per curiam).
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F. App'x 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roberto-oliver-guzman-ca9-2011.