United States v. Robert Milligan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6786

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT DEWAYNE MILLIGAN, a/k/a Wayne,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00669-RBH-6)

Submitted: September 16, 2015 Decided: October 1, 2015

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Dewayne Milligan, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Dewayne Milligan appeals the district court’s order

denying Milligan’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Milligan, No.

4:12-cr-00669-RHB-6 (D.S.C. May 8, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED