United States v. Robert E. Hyde

124 F.3d 1033, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6970, 97 Daily Journal DAR 11254, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22776, 1997 WL 528358
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 28, 1997·No. 95-10113·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

[1034]*1034FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:

Robert Elmer Hyde was indicted for mail fraud and wire fraud. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, 2(b). He entered into a plea agreement, and the district court accepted his plea. Hyde then sought to withdraw his plea, but the district court refused to allow him to do so. He appealed.

We agreed that the district court had erred and we reversed. United States v. Hyde, 82 F.3d 319 (9th Cir.), amended, 92 F.3d 779 (1996). However, the United States Supreme Corut disagreed; it reversed us. United States v. Hyde, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1630, 137 L.Ed.2d 935 (1997). Therefore, we now affirm the district court’s determination.1

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robert E. Hyde, 124 F.3d 1033, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6970, 97 Daily Journal DAR 11254, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22776, 1997 WL 528358 (9th Cir. 1997).

124 F.3d 1033 (United States v. Robert E. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Toby C. Patterson
292 F.3d 615 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Robert E. Hyde
124 F.3d 1033 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)