United States v. Robert Bazan-Molina

544 F.2d 193, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5807
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 16, 1976
Docket76-2348
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 544 F.2d 193 (United States v. Robert Bazan-Molina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Bazan-Molina, 544 F.2d 193, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5807 (5th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

*194 PER CURIAM:

Robert Bazan-Molina has appealed from his conviction in the Southern District of Texas for possession of ISO pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute. Finding his only contention to be without merit, we affirm.

While driving on United States Highway 281, the appellant was stopped at a permanent border patrol checkpoint located seven miles south of Falfurrias, Texas. The appellant’s vehicle had all of the windows rolled up. When the appellant opened his door to respond to the border patrolman’s questions concerning his citizenship status, the officer detected the odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle. With suspicions aroused, the officer peered through the windows of the vehicle and noticed seeds and leaves resembling marijuana on the floor below the backseat of the car. A subsequent search yielded 130 pounds of marijuana in brick form.

Appellant contends that the stopping of his vehicle and the ensuing search violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment. This conclusion is unwarranted under the decisions of this court. We have consistently held that the border patrol checkpoint near Falfurrias, Texas is a permanent checkpoint. Stopping vehicles at such checkpoints to inquire into citizenship does not violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, — U.S. —, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976). Searching a vehicle at a permanent checkpoint is valid if, after stopping the vehicle, the border patrolman has probable cause to make the search. United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891, 95 S.Ct. 2585, 45 L.Ed.2d 623 (1975). The officer’s detection of the odor of marijuana coupled with his observation of marijuana debris in the backseat area furnished probable cause for the search. United States v. Torres, 537 F.2d 1299, 1300 (5th Cir. 1976).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Oyarzun
582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Texas, 1984)
United States v. Efren Fontecha
576 F.2d 601 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Jose Arredondo-Hernandez
574 F.2d 1312 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Roy Lee Blanford
566 F.2d 470 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. John Paul Gorthy
550 F.2d 1051 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Arnoldo Cantu Garza
547 F.2d 1234 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
544 F.2d 193, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-bazan-molina-ca5-1976.