United States v. Ortiz

Supreme Court

United States v. Ortiz

420 U.S. 905, 95 S. Ct. 822

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 27, 1975

DocketNo. 73-2050; No. 73-6848

StatusPublished

This text of 420 U.S. 905 (United States v. Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ortiz, 420 U.S. 905, 95 S. Ct. 822 (1975).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 419 U. S. 824.] Motion of the Solicitor General to consolidate cases for oral argument granted and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument. Motion for appointment of new counsel in No. 73-2050 granted. It is ordered that Charles M. Sevilla, Esquire, of San Diego, Cal., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case, and John J. Cleary, Esquire, is hereby relieved of his prior appointment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 419 U. S. 824.] Motion of the Solicitor General to consolidate cases for oral argument granted and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument. Motion for appointment of new counsel in No. 73-2050 granted. It is ordered that Charles M. Sevilla, Esquire, of San Diego, Cal., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case, and John J. Cleary, Esquire, is hereby relieved of his prior appointment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

420 U.S. 905, 95 S. Ct. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ortiz-scotus-1975.