United States v. Roach

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2008·No. 08-7721·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7721

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ZELMAN ROACH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00207-RLW-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zelman Roach, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Zelman Roach appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Roach, No. 3:05-cr-00207-RLW-1

(E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Roach, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Roach (United States v. Roach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related