United States v. Rivera

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rivera. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 F.3d 310
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2002·No. 02-20338·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20338 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-147-2 -------------------- November 7, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appointed counsel representing Jose Rivera has requested

leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rivera has not filed

a response to counsel's motion to withdraw. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-20338 -2-

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in

this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rivera, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Rivera (United States v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)