United States v. Rivera
This text of United States v. Rivera (United States v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50294 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESSE R. RIVERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-98-CR-238-1-SS -------------------- October 19, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The district court found that the untimely notice of appeal
filed by Jesse R. Rivera was not due to excusable neglect.
Rivera’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).
After twice being directed to do so by this court, counsel filed
a brief addressing whether the district court’s finding of no
excusable neglect was an abuse of discretion. We have reviewed
such brief and find no abuse of discretion. See United States v.
Clark, 51 F.3d 42, 43-44 & n.5 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-50294 -2-
appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See United States
v. Merrifield, 764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985). The motion to
withdraw is DENIED as moot.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rivera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rivera-ca5-2000.