United States v. Rivas-Garcia
This text of 153 F. App'x 992 (United States v. Rivas-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Miguel Rivas-Garcia appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He contends that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), is no longer good law and that the district court violated his constitutional rights in enhancing his sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) and § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines based on a non-jury fact finding regarding his prior commission of an aggravated felony. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 F. App'x 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rivas-garcia-ca9-2005.