United States v. Rios-Cruz

197 F. App'x 372
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 8, 2006
Docket05-41560
StatusUnpublished

This text of 197 F. App'x 372 (United States v. Rios-Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rios-Cruz, 197 F. App'x 372 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

*373 PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Leopoldo Rios-Cruz raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 F. App'x 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rios-cruz-ca5-2006.