United States v. Riley

675 F. App'x 363
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 2017
DocketNo. 16-7408
StatusPublished

This text of 675 F. App'x 363 (United States v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Riley, 675 F. App'x 363 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Riley’s motion. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mitchell Smalls
720 F.3d 193 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 F. App'x 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riley-ca4-2017.