United States v. Riley

211 F.3d 1207, 2000 WL 564530
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 16, 2000·No. 99-2426·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. Steven Lawrence RILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-2426.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit. Nov. 8, 2000.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 98-00288-CR-T-26E); Richard A. Lazzara, Judge. Before TJOFLAT, COX and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

We sua sponte grant rehearing in this appeal. Our opinion is published at 211 F.3d 1207 (11th Cir.2000). After we filed our opinion in this appeal, but before the mandate issued, the Supreme Court decided

Castillo v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 120 S.Ct. 2090, 147 L.Ed.2d 94 (2000), which casts doubt on the

correctness of our ruling rejecting Riley's challenge to the enhanced penalty the district court imposed on him under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). We accordingly vacate the portion of our prior opinion addressing the § 924(c)

sentencing issue and direct the clerk to schedule the appeal for oral argument on that issue before a regular oral-argument panel.

REHEARING GRANTED; OPINION VACATED IN PART; ORAL ARGUMENT GRANTED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Riley, 211 F.3d 1207, 2000 WL 564530 (11th Cir. 2000).

211 F.3d 1207 (United States v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Leslie Perkins
204 F. App'x 799 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Maureen Gray
159 F. App'x 172 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Steven Lawrence Riley
250 F.3d 1303 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Riley
211 F.3d 1207 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)