United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.

915 F.3d 591
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2019·No. 16-10150·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:96-cr-00464-DLR-4 v. District of Arizona, Phoenix RILEY BRIONES, Jr., AKA Unknown Spitz, ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Watford did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Riley Briones, Jr., 915 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 2019).

915 F.3d 591 (United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.
35 F.4th 1150 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)