United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.

915 F.3d 591
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 2019
Docket16-10150
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 915 F.3d 591 (United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Riley Briones, Jr., 915 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:96-cr-00464-DLR-4 v. District of Arizona, Phoenix RILEY BRIONES, Jr., AKA Unknown Spitz, ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Watford did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.
35 F.4th 1150 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
915 F.3d 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riley-briones-jr-ca9-2019.