United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.
This text of 915 F.3d 591 (United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:96-cr-00464-DLR-4 v. District of Arizona, Phoenix RILEY BRIONES, Jr., AKA Unknown Spitz, ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be
cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Watford did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
915 F.3d 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riley-briones-jr-ca9-2019.