United States v. Rigas

592 F.3d 460, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 795, 105 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 561, 2010 WL 105709
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 2010
Docket08-3218
StatusPublished

This text of 592 F.3d 460 (United States v. Rigas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rigas, 592 F.3d 460, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 795, 105 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 561, 2010 WL 105709 (3d Cir. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, Chief Judge.

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing filed by Appellee the United States of America and the answer filed by Appellants John J. Rigas and Timothy Rigas, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is granted on the sole issue of whether the two clauses in 18 U.S.C. § 371 — the “offense” clause and the “defraud” clause — constitute separate offenses under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution.

The Clerk of this Court shall list the appeal for rehearing en banc on Wednesday, February 17, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. Additional briefing in this matter is not required. The parties are directed to file an additional 25 copies of the briefs which were previously filed with the Clerk within 14 days from the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 F.3d 460, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 795, 105 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 561, 2010 WL 105709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rigas-ca3-2010.