FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 63
Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud"
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
For the purposes of this chapter, the term "scheme or artifice to defraud" includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
18 U.S.C. § 1346 (Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud") — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.
12 F.3d 1170 (Second Circuit, 1993)
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.
537 U.S. 393 (Supreme Court, 2003)
United States v. Rybicki
354 F.3d 124 (Second Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Veal
153 F.3d 1233 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Lawrence S. Bloom
149 F.3d 649 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Warner
498 F.3d 666 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Holley
23 F.3d 902 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Schwartz
924 F.2d 410 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Black v. United States
561 U.S. 465 (Supreme Court, 2010)
United States v. Segal
495 F.3d 826 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Trapilo
130 F.3d 547 (Second Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Werner Bruchhausen
977 F.2d 464 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Smith
985 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D. New York, 2014)
United States v. Payne
272 F. Supp. 939 (D. Connecticut, 1967)
United States v. Dimora
843 F. Supp. 2d 799 (N.D. Ohio, 2012)
Batten v. State
591 So. 2d 960 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Gallo v. LiMandri
102 A.D.3d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
United States v. Karl
264 F. App'x 550 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Alvanos, Stephen v. Roesler, Lance
(W.D. Wisconsin, 2024)
Com. v. Perretta-Rosepink, A.
(Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7603(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4508.)