United States v. Rideout

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7937

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

KEVIN A. RIDEOUT, a/k/a JD,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00007-FPS-JES-12)

Submitted: May 27, 2010 Decided: June 8, 2010

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin A. Rideout, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kevin A. Rideout appeals the district court’s order

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Rideout, No. 2:00-cr-00007-FPS-JES-12 (N.D. W. Va.

Sept. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED