United States v. Riddick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6226

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES LOUIS RIDDICK, a/k/a Fishman,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:95-cr-00014-BO-4)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Louis Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Louis Riddick appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Riddick, No.

2:95-cr-00014-BO-4 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED