United States v. Ricky Lewis

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ricky Lewis

507 F. App'x 325

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2013·No. 12-7843·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Jerome Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying his- 18 U.S.C, § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lewis, No. 5:08-cr-00061-RLVDCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are *326 adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Jerome Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying his- 18 U.S.C, § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lewis, No. 5:08-cr-00061-RLVDCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are *326 adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ricky Lewis, 507 F. App'x 325 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

507 F. App'x 325 (United States v. Ricky Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related