United States v. Ricketts

60 F. App'x 950
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ricketts. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 F. App'x 4
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 22, 2003·No. No. 02-7894·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Leigh Ricketts, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Ricketts has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ricketts, 60 F. App'x 950 (4th Cir. 2003).

60 F. App'x 950 (United States v. Ricketts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)