United States v. Richardson
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-50782 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PAMELA PURSELY RICHARDSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-02-CR-12-2
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Pamela Pursely
Richardson has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Richardson has not filed a response to counsel’s motion
and brief. Our independent review of the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-50782 -2-
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Richardson (United States v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.