United States v. Richardson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 F. App'x 931
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2003·No. 02-50782·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-50782 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PAMELA PURSELY RICHARDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-02-CR-12-2

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Pamela Pursely

Richardson has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Richardson has not filed a response to counsel’s motion

and brief. Our independent review of the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-50782 -2-

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Richardson, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Richardson (United States v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)