United States v. Richardson
This text of United States v. Richardson (United States v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-10871 & 02-10872 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
L. D. RICHARDSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:92-CR-108-1-C -------------------- February 25, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender (FPD), appointed to represent
appellant L. D. Richardson, has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Richardson has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, the FPD is excused from
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10871 -2-
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Richardson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richardson-ca5-2004.