United States v. Richardson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Richardson

523 F. App'x 232

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 13-6268·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM:

Robert Isadore Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Richardson, No. 3:05-cr-00040-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM:

Robert Isadore Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Richardson, No. 3:05-cr-00040-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Richardson, 523 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

523 F. App'x 232 (United States v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related