United States v. Richards

677 F. App'x 130
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2017
DocketNo. 16-7508
StatusPublished

This text of 677 F. App'x 130 (United States v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Richards, 677 F. App'x 130 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Kermit Richards, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendments 782 and 794 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, both of the Guidelines Amendments under which Richards sought a sentence reduction were in effect at the time of Richards’ February 2016 sentencing. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Richards, No. 1:14-cr-00385-CCB-1 (D. Md. Oct. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 F. App'x 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richards-ca4-2017.