United States v. Reliford

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Reliford. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 F.3d 285
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2000·No. 99-40475·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40475 c/w No. 99-40477

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ERIC JEROME RELIFORD,

Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:98-CR-67-1 -------------------- March 1, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric

Jerome Reliford has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reliford

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Reliford, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Reliford (United States v. Reliford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)