United States v. Reese

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CURTIS ANTONIO REESE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Antonio Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Curtis Antonio Reese appeals the district court’s

order denying Reese’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Reese, No. 3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1 (D.S.C.

Oct. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED