United States v. Reedy McCallum
423 F.2d 1206, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10009
This text of 423 F.2d 1206 (United States v. Reedy McCallum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Reedy McCallum, 423 F.2d 1206, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10009 (4th Cir. 1970).
Opinion
After a brief on behalf of the appellant, Reedy McCallum, was filed, the government moved for a summary, affirmance. Our consideration of the brief, the motion, and the record leads us to the conclusion that this appeal presents no substantial question. The government’s motion is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas H. Hopkins v. United States
423 F.2d 1206 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
423 F.2d 1206, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reedy-mccallum-ca4-1970.