Thomas H. Hopkins v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Thomas H. Hopkins v. United States

423 F.2d 1206, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9841

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 10, 1970·No. 29244·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the district court denied the appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 without making findings of fact and conclusions of law, as is required by the provisions of Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P. See Welch v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1968, 400 F.2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 74. Therefore the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings and conclusions.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case the district court denied the appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 without making findings of fact and conclusions of law, as is required by the provisions of Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P. See Welch v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1968, 400 F.2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 74. Therefore the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings and conclusions.

Remanded.

Thomas H. Hopkins v. United States, 423 F.2d 1206, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9841 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

423 F.2d 1206 (Thomas H. Hopkins v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related