United States v. Rashaun Judge

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 1, 2023
• Docket: 23-6244
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6244 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6244

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RASHAUN ALLEN JUDGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:17-cr-00301-RMG-1)

Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rashaun Allen Judge, Appellant Pro Se. Emily Evans Limehouse, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6244 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Rashaun Allen Judge appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of

a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d

326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not

abuse its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. See United

States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation

required for denial of compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED