United States v. Randy Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Randy Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 949 F.3d 1056
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 13, 2020·No. 18-3318·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Office of the Clerk Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street Phone: (312) 435-5850 Chicago, Illinois 60604 www.ca7.uscourts.gov

ORDER February 13, 2020

Before AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee

No. 18-3318 v.

RANDY WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 2:17-cr-20049-SLD-EIL-1 Central District of Illinois District Judge Sara Darrow

Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT OPINION, filed on February 11, 2020, by counsel for the appellee,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. On page three of the opinion in the second full paragraph, the third sentence of the paragraph is CORRECTED to read: In those emails, Judge Bruce criticized one of the prosecutors as being “entirely unexperienced” turning a “slam-dunk” case into a “60-40” for the defendant.

form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Randy Williams, (7th Cir. 2020).

United States v. Randy Williams (United States v. Randy Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.