Home/D.C. Circuit/United States v. Randall B. Husar

United States v. Randall B. Husar

866 F.2d 1533, 275 U.S. App. D.C. 415, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2066, 1989 WL 11128
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 1989
Docket87-3076, 88-3020
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 866 F.2d 1533 (United States v. Randall B. Husar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Randall B. Husar, 866 F.2d 1533, 275 U.S. App. D.C. 415, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2066, 1989 WL 11128 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

Opinions

D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge,

dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc:

This case raises important and difficult federalism issues, which in my view warrant rehearing by the court en banc. Having studied the panel opinion and the petition for rehearing, but being without the advantage of full scale treatment, I remain unconvinced that Congress intended to intrude the federal government so far into the field of civil commitment historically reserved to the states.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Yao Kuang Saeteurn
28 F.3d 110 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Bridget M. Denny-Shaffer
2 F.3d 999 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Randall B. Husar
866 F.2d 1533 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 F.2d 1533, 275 U.S. App. D.C. 415, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2066, 1989 WL 11128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-randall-b-husar-cadc-1989.