United States v. Randall B. Husar
866 F.2d 1533, 275 U.S. App. D.C. 415, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2066, 1989 WL 11128
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 14, 1989·No. 87-3076, 88-3020·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc:
This case raises important and difficult federalism issues, which in my view warrant rehearing by the court en banc. Having studied the panel opinion and the petition for rehearing, but being without the advantage of full scale treatment, I remain unconvinced that Congress intended to intrude the federal government so far into the field of civil commitment historically reserved to the states.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Randall B. Husar, 866 F.2d 1533, 275 U.S. App. D.C. 415, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2066, 1989 WL 11128 (D.C. Cir. 1989).
866 F.2d 1533 (United States v. Randall B. Husar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Yao Kuang Saeteurn
28 F.3d 110 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Bridget M. Denny-Shaffer
2 F.3d 999 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Randall B. Husar
866 F.2d 1533 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)