United States v. Ramos-Zuniga
115 F. App'x 263
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. No. 04-50130·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Ramos-Zuniga raises argu[264] merits that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ramos-Zuniga, 115 F. App'x 263 (5th Cir. 2004).
115 F. App'x 263 (United States v. Ramos-Zuniga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baez v. United States
544 U.S. 1014 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Cruz v. United States
544 U.S. 1013 (Supreme Court, 2005)