United States v. Ramos-Cruz

76 M.J. 346, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ramos-Cruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 M.J. 442
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided May 10, 2017·No. No. 17-0319/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20150292. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER, IN A COURT-MARTIAL TRIED BY MILITARY JUDGE ALONE, THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO USE THE CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT FOR MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 413 PURPOSES TO PROVE PROPENSITY TO COMMIT THE CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramos-Cruz, 76 M.J. 346, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 454 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 346 (United States v. Ramos-Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.