United States v. Ramos-Cruz
76 M.J. 346, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 454
This text of 76 M.J. 346 (United States v. Ramos-Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Ramos-Cruz, 76 M.J. 346, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 454 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20150292. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER, IN A COURT-MARTIAL TRIED BY MILITARY JUDGE ALONE, THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO USE THE CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT FOR MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 413 PURPOSES TO PROVE PROPENSITY TO COMMIT THE CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 346, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramos-cruz-armfor-2017.