United States v. Ramos-Cruz

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Ramos-Cruz

76 M.J. 442, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 752

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided July 27, 2017·No. No. 17-0319/AR·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CCA 20150292. On further consideration of the granted issue, 76 M.J. 346 (C.A.A.F. 2017) (order granting review, May 10, 2017), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a new review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2012), to evaluate the case in light of United States v. Hukill, 76 M.J. 219 (C.A.A.F. 2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20150292. On further consideration of the granted issue, 76 M.J. 346 (C.A.A.F. 2017) (order granting review, May 10, 2017), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a new review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2012), to evaluate the case in light of United States v. Hukill, 76 M.J. 219 (C.A.A.F. 2017).

United States v. Ramos-Cruz, 76 M.J. 442, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 752 (Ark. 2017).

Pincite

76 M.J. 442 (United States v. Ramos-Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related