United States v. Ramos

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2025·No. 24-50262·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-50262 Document: 54-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 24-50262

FILED

January 28, 2025

Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Samuel Quiroz Ramos,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-92-1

Before Richman, Douglas, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Samuel Quiroz Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-50262 Document: 54-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/28/2025

No. 24-50262

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramos, (5th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Ramos (United States v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)