United States v. Ramos

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 28, 2025
Docket24-50262
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ramos (United States v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ramos, (5th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

Case: 24-50262 Document: 54-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 24-50262 FILED January 28, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Samuel Quiroz Ramos,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-92-1 ______________________________

Before Richman, Douglas, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Samuel Quiroz Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-50262 Document: 54-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/28/2025

No. 24-50262

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ramos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramos-ca5-2025.