United States v. Ramos

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2023·No. 22-10346·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-10346 Document: 00516606723 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10346 FILED January 11, 2023 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Fidel Ramos,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CR-155-12 ______________________________

Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Fidel Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10346 Document: 00516606723 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2023

No. 22-10346

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramos, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Ramos (United States v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)