United States v. Ramiro Lucio Leal-Chavez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 15, 2016·No. 15-14638·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 15-14638 Date Filed: 04/15/2016 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-14638

Non-Argument Calendar

D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20419-JEM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMIRO LUCIO LEAL-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

(April 15, 2016)

Case: 15-14638 Date Filed: 04/15/2016 Page: 2 of 2

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, FAY, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ramiro Lucio Leal-Chavez appeals his 60-month sentence, imposed below the guideline range, after being convicted of illegal entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court did not err by considering the nature of Leal-Chavez’s prior conviction; Leal-Chavez’s constitutional arguments are foreclosed by binding Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit precedent. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 118 S. Ct. 1219 (1998); United States v. Beckles, 565 F.3d 832 (11th Cir. 2009); United States v. Spears, 443 F.3d 1358 (11th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramiro Lucio Leal-Chavez, (11th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Ramiro Lucio Leal-Chavez (United States v. Ramiro Lucio Leal-Chavez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Aaron Deshon Spears
443 F.3d 1358 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Beckles
565 F.3d 832 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)