United States v. Rameker (In re Kochell)

55 B.R. 380, 14 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 65, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13498
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin
DecidedNovember 26, 1985
DocketBankruptcy No. MM7-82-00560; No. 85-C-913-S
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 B.R. 380 (United States v. Rameker (In re Kochell)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rameker (In re Kochell), 55 B.R. 380, 14 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 65, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13498 (W.D. Wis. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHABAZ, District Judge.

This case is an appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s decision holding that early distributions of an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) and a pension plan to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate are not subject to the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty tax set forth in 26 U.S.C. §§ 408(f), 72(m)(5). This Court has jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(a) and 1334(a).

FACTS

On December 23, 1982, the Bankruptcy Court, 26 B.R. 86, held that the debtor’s IRA and pension accounts were not exempt property and were a part of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate. The debtor’s IRA and pension funds were distributed to the bankruptcy estate in 1984.

[382]*382The bankruptcy trustee filed a motion on or about February 21, 1985, requesting a determination of the taxes applicable to the bankruptcy estate under 26 U.S.C. §§ 402 and 408 by reason of the IRA distribution. A hearing was held before the Bankruptcy Court on March 11, 1985, with the United States opposing the trustee’s motion. On August 26, 1985, 53 B.R. 250, the Bankruptcy Court held that the penalty set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 408(f)(1) did not apply to the distribution of the IRA to the bankruptcy estate. The United States has appealed the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.

MEMORANDUM

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the distribution of an IRA to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate is subject to the 10 percent early distribution penalty tax imposed by 26 U.S.C. § 408(f). Since this appeal presents a legal question only, this Court will address the issue de novo.

When a bankruptcy case is commenced, a bankruptcy estate is created. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a). The bankruptcy estate includes “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property, as of the commencement of the case.” 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). In other words, all the debtor’s interests in property are transferred to the bankruptcy estate when the debtor commences bankruptcy.

The transfer of debtor's property from the debtor to the bankruptcy estate is not a taxable disposition, however. As 26 U.S.C. § 1398(f)(1) provides:

(1) Transfer to estate not treated as disposition. — A transfer (other than by sale or exchange) of an asset from the debtor to the estate shall not be treated as a disposition for purposes of any provision of this title assigning tax consequences to a disposition, and the estate shall be treated as the debtor would be treated with respect to such asset.

According to the Committee Reports for the Bankruptcy Tax Act of 1980, which enacted § 1398, the purpose of § 1398(f)(1) was to insure that the transfer of an asset into the bankruptcy estate did not result in a taxable event requiring recognition of gain, loss, recapture income or acceleration of income to the debtor. H.R. No. 833, 96th Cong., 2d. Sess. (1980) (Bankruptcy Tax Act of 1980), p. 26; S.Rep. No. 1035, 96th Cong., 2d. Sess. (1980) (Bankruptcy Tax Act of 1980), p. 31, U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1980, pp. 7017, 7045. Section 1398(f)(1) now makes clear that a transfer of an asset to the bankruptcy estate when bankruptcy is commenced is not a taxable disposition.

Once the bankruptcy estate possesses the debtor’s interest in the asset, the bankruptcy estate succeeds to certain tax attributes the asset had in the hands of the debtor. Specifically, the estate succeeds to the basis, holding period, and character the asset had in the hands of the debtor. 26 U.S.C. § 1398(g)(6). These tax attributes of the asset, along with other enumerated tax attributes of the debtor, are taken into account when determining the tax liability of the bankruptcy estate.

At issue in this case is the bankruptcy estate’s liability for a 10 percent early distribution penalty imposed by the early distribution of an IRA. 26 U.S.C. § 408(f).

In 1982, the Bankruptcy Court held that debtor’s interest in an IRA was part of the bankruptcy estate and was not exempt property. Debtor’s interest in the IRA was then transferred to the bankruptcy estate. The transfer to the estate was not a disposition that gave rise to any tax consequences. 26 U.S.C. § 1398(f).

Once the bankruptcy estate possessed debtor’s interest in the IRA, the bankruptcy estate succeeded to the basis, holding period, and character of the IRA. The character of an asset generally means whether it is an ordinary income asset, capital asset, or trade or business asset. The IRA was an ordinary income asset in the hands of the debtor, and therefore was an ordinary income asset in the hands of the estate. 26 U.S.C. § 1398(g)(6).

Subsequently, debtor’s interest in the IRA was distributed to the bankruptcy es[383]*383tate. 26 U.S.C. § 408(f)(1) sets forth the tax consequence of an early distribution from an IRA. 26 U.S.C. § 408(f)(1) states:

(f) Additional tax on certain amounts included in gross income before age 59V2—
(1) Early distributions from an individual retirement account, etc.—If a distribution from an individual retirement account or under an individual retirement annuity to the individual for whose benefit such account or annuity was established is made before such individual attains age 59V2, his tax under this chapter for the taxable year in which such distribution is received shall be increased by an amount equal to 10 percent of the amount of the distribution which is includible in his gross income for such taxable year.

Read literally, the penalty provision of § 408(f)(1) only applies to an early distribution of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the account was established. The penalty provision of § 408(f)(1) does not seem to apply to an early distribution of an IRA to the bankruptcy estate.

Appellant United States, however, argues that legislative history and policy dictate that the § 408(f)(1) penalty provisions apply in these circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 B.R. 380, 14 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 65, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rameker-in-re-kochell-wiwd-1985.