United States v. Rafael Marroquin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rafael Marroquin. Read the opinion of the Court — 884 F.3d 298
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2018·No. 16-40367·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40367

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RAFAEL RIOS MARROQUIN, also known as Tomas Andres Marroquin,

Defendant - Appellant

consolidated with

16-40368

RAFAEL RIOS MARROQUIN,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC No. 16-40367 c/w 16-40368

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. Ap. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), rehearing en banc is DENIED. In the en banc poll, three judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jones, Smith, and Ho), and twelve judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Dennis, Clement, Prado, Owen, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, and Willett). Judge Smith, joined by Judges Jones and Ho, dissents from the Court’s denial of rehearing en banc, and his dissent is attached.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

_________________________________ GREGG COSTA United States Circuit Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rafael Marroquin, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Rafael Marroquin (United States v. Rafael Marroquin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.