United States v. Rafael Marroquin

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 2018
Docket16-40367
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Rafael Marroquin (United States v. Rafael Marroquin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rafael Marroquin, (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40367

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RAFAEL RIOS MARROQUIN, also known as Tomas Andres Marroquin,

Defendant - Appellant

consolidated with

16-40368

RAFAEL RIOS MARROQUIN,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC No. 16-40367 c/w 16-40368

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. Ap. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), rehearing en banc is DENIED. In the en banc poll, three judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jones, Smith, and Ho), and twelve judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Dennis, Clement, Prado, Owen, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, and Willett). Judge Smith, joined by Judges Jones and Ho, dissents from the Court’s denial of rehearing en banc, and his dissent is attached.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

_________________________________ GREGG COSTA United States Circuit Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Rafael Marroquin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rafael-marroquin-ca5-2018.