United States v. Rady Williams
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
No. 24-11576
Non-Argument Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus RADY WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:22-mj-00786-JKL-1
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11576
Before LUCK, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Rady Williams appeals directly from the magistrate judge’s May 2, 2024 criminal judgment and sentence, but we lack jurisdiction to entertain a direct appeal from a judgment entered in a criminal case by a magistrate judge. See 18 U.S.C. § 3402; United States v. Pilati, 627 F.3d 1360, 1363-64 (11th Cir. 2010); Midway Mfg. Co. v. Kruckenberg, 720 F.2d 653, 654 (11th Cir. 1983). Such appeals must be taken to the district court first. See id.
All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rady Williams (United States v. Rady Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.