United States v. Rady Williams
This text of United States v. Rady Williams (United States v. Rady Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-11576 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-11576 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RADY WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:22-mj-00786-JKL-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-11576 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11576
Before LUCK, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Rady Williams appeals directly from the magistrate judge’s May 2, 2024 criminal judgment and sentence, but we lack jurisdic- tion to entertain a direct appeal from a judgment entered in a crim- inal case by a magistrate judge. See 18 U.S.C. § 3402; United States v. Pilati, 627 F.3d 1360, 1363-64 (11th Cir. 2010); Midway Mfg. Co. v. Kruckenberg, 720 F.2d 653, 654 (11th Cir. 1983). Such appeals must be taken to the district court first. See id. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rady Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rady-williams-ca11-2024.