FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 219
Rules of procedure, practice and appeal 1
18 U.S.C. § 3402
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter219 — TRIAL BY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3402 (Rules of procedure, practice and appeal 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3402.
Text
In all cases of conviction by a United States magistrate judge an appeal of right shall lie from the judgment of the magistrate judge to a judge of the district court of the district in which the offense was committed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Charles Davis AKA Marcus Anderson
482 F.2d 893 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
In Re Extradition of Curtis Andrew Howard. United States of America v. Curtis Andrew Howard
996 F.2d 1320 (First Circuit, 1993)
Salt Lake City v. Ohms
881 P.2d 844 (Utah Supreme Court, 1994)
United States v. Christopher D. Wilmer
799 F.2d 495 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Tpo, Incorporated v. Hon. Thomas R. McMillen
460 F.2d 348 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
United States v. David Tannehill Clark
986 F.2d 65 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. John Crane, (Aka Donald Kotlick)
979 F.2d 687 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Davis
339 F.3d 1223 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Parker
362 F.3d 1279 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Rafique Aslam
936 F.2d 751 (Second Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Mark Bader
698 F.2d 553 (First Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Oscar Chavez-Diaz
949 F.3d 1202 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
United States v. Clifton Thibodeaux
663 F.2d 520 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Harvey W. Van Fossan
899 F.2d 636 (Seventh Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Donald Thomas Margraf
483 F.2d 708 (Third Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Robert W. Flitcraft and Rebecca A. Flitcraft
803 F.2d 184 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
City of Aurora, by and on Behalf of the People of the State of Colorado v. Samuel Mansford Erwin
706 F.2d 295 (Tenth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. McFarland
445 F.3d 29 (First Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Masciandaro
648 F. Supp. 2d 779 (E.D. Virginia, 2009)
United States v. Brian Alan Sweeney, United States of America v. Christopher Knight
914 F.2d 1260 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 831; Pub. L. 90–578, title III, §302(b), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1116; Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, §404(b)(2), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4651; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18 U.S.C., 1940 ed., §576a (Oct. 9, 1940, ch. 685, §2, 54 Stat. 1059).
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–702 struck out second par. which read as follows: "The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules of procedure and practice for the trial of cases before magistrates and for taking and hearing of appeals to the judges of the district courts of the United States."
1968—Pub. L. 90–578 provided that the appeal shall be of right, substituted "a United States magistrate", "magistrate", and "magistrates" for "United States commissioners", "commissioner", and "commissioners", respectively, and provided that the appeals be to the judge of the district court and not to the district court and that the rules of the Supreme Court relate to appeals to the judges of the district courts rather than to the district courts.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
"United States magistrate judge" and "magistrate judge" substituted for "United States magistrate" and "magistrate", respectively, in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–702 effective Dec. 1, 1988, see section 407 of Pub. L. 100–702, set out as a note under section 2071 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–578 effective Oct. 17, 1968, except when a later effective date is applicable, which is the earlier of date when implementation of amendment by appointment of magistrates [now United States magistrate judges] and assumption of office takes place or third anniversary of enactment of Pub. L. 90–578 on Oct. 17, 1968, see section 403 of Pub. L. 90–578, set out as a note under section 631 of title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Based on title 18 U.S.C., 1940 ed., §576a (Oct. 9, 1940, ch. 685, §2, 54 Stat. 1059).
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–702 struck out second par. which read as follows: "The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules of procedure and practice for the trial of cases before magistrates and for taking and hearing of appeals to the judges of the district courts of the United States."
1968—Pub. L. 90–578 provided that the appeal shall be of right, substituted "a United States magistrate", "magistrate", and "magistrates" for "United States commissioners", "commissioner", and "commissioners", respectively, and provided that the appeals be to the judge of the district court and not to the district court and that the rules of the Supreme Court relate to appeals to the judges of the district courts rather than to the district courts.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
"United States magistrate judge" and "magistrate judge" substituted for "United States magistrate" and "magistrate", respectively, in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–702 effective Dec. 1, 1988, see section 407 of Pub. L. 100–702, set out as a note under section 2071 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–578 effective Oct. 17, 1968, except when a later effective date is applicable, which is the earlier of date when implementation of amendment by appointment of magistrates [now United States magistrate judges] and assumption of office takes place or third anniversary of enactment of Pub. L. 90–578 on Oct. 17, 1968, see section 403 of Pub. L. 90–578, set out as a note under section 631 of title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3402.